skip to content
Visual Studies Prospectus
University of california, Irvine

Preparing and Writing Your Visual Studies Prospectus

Ingredients - Thesis Statement - Literature Review/Historiography
- Methodology - Chapter Outline - Research Plan - Bibliography -
Formatting, Deadlines - References for Writing Prospectus Dissertation

A Recipe for Flexibility

Your prospectus serves an important purpose in a number of contexts. First, you will at some point present this document to your committee, and meet with them to discuss its contents. Second, a prospectus can, with some adjustments, be useful for grant applications. Third, much of the prospectus can likely be used in the construction of the Introduction section of your dissertation. That it can and should serve many functions is one of the reasons a prospectus is difficult to write. Keep in mind, however, that the primary goals for the prospectus remain the same, for the most part, in each of the aforementioned contexts. The prospectus should set out four things: 1) Your argument and the stakes that will drive your project; 2) Your sources and the contribution of your work to the field of Visual Studies (and likely other fields); 3) Your methodology and why it is the best orienting frame for your project; 4) The structure of your dissertation (ie, a chapter outline) and how every chapter is a necessary link to building your argument.

The importance of the prospectus to give you and your committee an idea of the stakes of your dissertation and to determine the place of your work in Visual Studies cannot be underestimated, however, you should not consider the prospectus a word-for-word contract either. Some of the most productive moments, in fact, occur when you change some of your original plan-don't be afraid to do so. Keeping in mind the fairly flexible nature of the prospectus document is valuable, because many graduate students strive to create a "perfect" prospectus that they can use as-is throughout the dissertation process. This can be a dangerous goal and likely will lead to the delay of prospectus completion. Writing and research for your prospectus forces you to figure out some key elements of your dissertation, but finishing your prospectus allows you to begin your dissertation. Determine with your committee a deadline for your prospectus.

The following guidelines can be seen as a sort of "recipe." Each "cook" might add her or his own spices, or alter some of the ingredients. Remember that each advisor will make individual recommendations, so consider this document a basic starting point from which you will concoct your own, unique "dish". Communicate with your committee about what their expectations are and ask them what they recommend based on your particular project. Also please take a look at other students' dissertations (particularly at the Introduction), both in Visual Studies and other fields, to get additional ideas on writing a prospectus. Before getting to information on the sections of a prospectus, here are three overall questions and concerns to consider:

  • Worthwhile? Who is the audience for your project? What is its significance? What gaps does it fill? Does it build on the work of others?

  • Possible? Is your project possible? Consider difficulties you might encounter in regard to accessing sources, making claims, and completing your dissertation in a timely manner.

  • Length? This is usually determined in conversation with your committee. A prospectus in the UCI Visual Studies program can run anywhere from 8-25 pages, and this determination could depend on a number of factors. Work closely with your committee to decide what makes sense for you.

    Prospectus Ingredients

    • Thesis statement

      A prospectus thesis will likely be anywhere from 1-4 pages and will identify your main argument in straightforward, concise language. The thesis section of a prospectus should do a few things. First, and potentially even in the first sentence, state as clearly as possible what your dissertation will do and what it will argue. Second, explain the stakes of your argument and its importance to the fields with which you see your dissertation in conversation. Make a claim for the relevance of your argument-as groundbreaking, as building on another argument, etc. Why is your solution to a given problem essential? Why might it be necessary to make that argument now? What will be the impact of your work on Visual Studies (and other fields)?

      Show your committee (and future grant committees) that you have a clear understanding of your argument and the value of your overall project. The more straightforward you can communicate your thesis to your committee, the easier it will be for them to make recommendations and provide guidance.

    • Literature review/historiographical essay

      If the thesis is meant to as concisely as possible assert the essential questions, claims, and arguments of the dissertation, the literature review is meant to open up those claims into one or many fields of inquiry. These are the fields in which the work - research, methodological frameworks, etc. - of the dissertation will be completed. The purpose of the literature review is two-fold. First, the review shows that you are familiar with relevant literature within each field. Second, the review should define the reason why the dissertation would be a unique scholarly project that advances the field of Visual Studies (and likely other fields), by neither duplicating nor avoiding relevant articles, scholars, and arguments.

      In order to define the broadest possible "field" in which the dissertation will be produced, it may be useful to think in terms of several historical and theoretical registers. For example, a prospectus on early cinema could look at pre-cinematic technology, early photography, the history of audience reception of film, economic history of cinema, national and international film circulation, and the aesthetics of early movies. Another prospectus, focusing on feminist art, might look at theories of representation, gender in photography and painting, the history of feminist art practices, theories of medium, the cultural politics of art, and the specific modes of the practices of women artists.

      The literature review is not meant to be a list of authors and texts that will play a part in the dissertation writing. Rather, it is a way to situate the project in a larger scholarly context. To complete the literature review, one might proceed by reading relevant journal and monograph literature, focusing on recent works but also working with older, especially primary, sources. Beyond the narrowly defined "relevant" literature, it may also be useful to read contextually, looking for literature about the same time period, region, object, etc. When reading for the literature review, keep in mind a few organizing questions. What does each text tell you about the time, place, or phenomena under examination? What archival sources does your research point to? What methods/methodologies does the literature employ?

      This section of your prospectus should make clear your interpretation of the fields in question and how you situate your work vis-à-vis specific authors and/or texts. Remember, the purpose of the literature review is to set a field of study, and to thus organize a discursive matrix around your specific topic of examination.

    • Methodology

      The primary purpose of the methodology section is to assert the way(s) in which you will use/apply the material that is the basis of your research to your project. Whereas the literature review outlined the fields of inquiry, the methodology section is more selective, argumentative, and individualized to meet the needs of the dissertation as a whole. Other scholars have stakes in their methods, and your dissertation will proceed, at least in part, from the decisions you make in terms of these stakes. This does not only have to be a "use" model. Your dissertation may also disarticulate an interpretive or methodological scheme in terms of your object of analysis. In either case, this section should clearly set out your methodological approaches and their potential for making your dissertation more robust. This section should outline the ways in which you will proceed with writing. How do you plan on weighing various kinds of evidence (newsprint, visual media, scholarship, etc.)? What screens will you employ to account for bias and/or inaccuracies in primary and secondary sources?

      Many of the questions of methodology are worked out when you are actually writing. Nobody is expected to have a defined, set, and unalterable method before they actually begin working on the dissertation. What is required in this section is a general direction of methodological inquiry, with reference, of course, to specific works. Depending on the kind of dissertation you are writing, the literature review and the methodology section may be substantially similar. If, for example, you are writing about the various interpretive schemes one might apply to early cinema, then the theoretical work itself is the object of analysis. In this case, you may want to collapse these two sections into one. This is by no means required, however.

    • Chapter outline

      Before describing the chapter outline, it is important to consider its purpose. The chapter outline forces students to think carefully about the architecture of their dissertations, but it is very likely to change as the dissertation gets on its way. Your committee does not likely expect the exact organization, let alone the chapter titles to stay the same for your dissertation, but the practice of laying out the sections and considering carefully their order reminds a writer of the attention to detail required of dissertation construction. In addition, outlining your chapters is important in that it allows you to think through your project and gives you a chance to take notice of ways in which your dissertation might be too broad or too narrow.

      The way you organize your chapters tells your readers something about your approach. Consider how what you set out to do in your thesis section might gel with or contradict what you lay out in your chapter outline. How does the chapter organization reflect (or not) your intentions? What type of organization does your overall thesis suggest? Does it make sense to put the chapters into larger sections?

      The chapter outline should not only list chapters, but it should also provide a paragraph or so for each chapter to give your committee an idea of each chapter's content, as well as your logic for placing a given chapter first, second, third, etc.

    • Research plan

      This may or may not make sense to your committee to include in your prospectus, but it is helpful to write out, nonetheless. Quite simply, this section explains when and how you will write your dissertation. Do you need to spend some time in archives before you write? Do you foresee writing two chapters together because of their shared content/goals/foci? If you need to travel and/or require funding for your dissertation, how and when might this happen? What will you do if you are not able to travel? As with many other sections of your prospectus, your research plans can change quite a bit, but setting up a research plan might make you aware of goals that are too far-reaching for the amount of time available at UCI, or you might realize that you need to write more than one chapter at once, requiring you to make important temporal and psychological adjustments.

    • Bibliography

      This section at the end of the prospectus should contain all primary and secondary sources you have identified at this point. There are many ways to organize a bibliography, and it is definitely a very good idea to keep this consistent throughout the dissertation process to save yourself a lot of effort. Make sure to discuss this with your committee as you write your prospectus!

    UCI documents/requirements for dissertation

    References and Guide Books for Dissertation Writing

    • Brause, Rita S. Writing Your Doctoral Dissertation: Invisible Rules for Success. New York: RoutledgeFalmer 2002.
    • Clark, Irene L. Writing the Successful Thesis and Dissertation: Entering the Conversation. New Jersey: Prentice Hall 2006.
    • Davis, Gordon B. Writing the Doctoral Dissertation. New York: Barron's 1997.
    • Hale, Constance. Sin and Syntax: how to craft wickedly effective prose. New York: Broadway 2001 [UCI Lib: PE1408 .H299 1999]
    • Madsen, David. Successful Dissertations and Theses: A Guide to Graduate Research from Proposal to Completion. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey Bass 1992.
    • Rudestam, Kjell Erik, and Rae R. Newton. Surviving Your Dissertation: A Comprehensive Guide to Content and Process. Newbury Park: Sage 1992.
    • Sternberg, David. How to Complete and Survive a Doctoral Dissertation. New York: St.Martin's 1981.
    • See http://wid.ucdavis.edu/thesis/biblio.html for information on some of these texts

    Prospectus Guidelines compliled by Heather Murray, Tim Seiber, Nicole Woods, Peter Krapp
    Last Update: Spring 2007

    Aspects of this prospectus document were influenced by: http://plaza.ufl.edu/edale/Notes%20for%20dissertation%20prospectus%20writers.htm