| HUM 270 |
"Postmodern
Visuality " |
David Joselit |
The "postmodern"
is a category which is both empty and full. If on
the one hand, definitions of postmodern art are so multiple
and contradictory that they tend to cancel one another out,
on the other it has become an inescapable term of periodization
within contemporary cultural history and criticism.
This seminar seeks both to chart the theoretical field of
the postmodern, and to test these critical assertions by
applying them to specific art practices. The crux
of the course will be to askóand perhaps to answeróthe
question, "Is there a postmodern visuality?"
In other words, are there models of seeing and representing
the world which are specific to the postmodern era (which
for the purposes of this seminar begins in 1960 with the
emergence of Pop Art). This question has a certain
urgency at the present when, on the one hand, the discipline
of art history has been greatly influenced by literary theory,
and on the other literary and cultural studies have imported
the visual within their purview to greater and greater degrees.
To address this problem, the seminar will weave together
three categories of "text": canonical essays
on postmodernism by cultural and literary theorists (Jean
Baudrillard, Fredric Jameson, Jean-François Lyotard,
Homi Bhabha, and Judith Butler and others), postmodern art
history (Craig Owens, Benjamin Buchloh, Hal Foster, Kobena
Mercer, Amelia Jones, Rosalind Krauss and others), and works
of art (Andy Warhol, Carolee Schneemann, Bruce Nauman, Mary
Kelly, Jenny Holzer and others). Issues under discussion
will include the differences between textual and visual
models of knowledge, the degree of "criticality"
or subversion possible within postmodern art, and the relationship
between the postmodern and identity politics.