Notice! This event has passed.
Stable but Unresponsive: The Rise and Demise of Pinochet's Constitution, by Dr. Rodrigo Espinoza (LASC Event)
Stable but Unresponsive: The Rise and Demise of Pinochet's Constitution,
by Dr. Rodrigo Espinoza
February 18, 2020 | 3:30 PM-5:00 PM Event Location: SST 220B
by Dr. Rodrigo Espinoza
February 18, 2020 | 3:30 PM-5:00 PM Event Location: SST 220B
About the Speaker
Dr. Rodrigo Espinoza is Professor and Researcher at Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago de Chile.
About the Talk
Chile has been recognized as one of the most stable democracies and
economic systems in Latin America. However, since last October, the
system has been suffering its biggest collapse of the last three
decades: millions of citizens took to the streets of Santiago demanding
an end to corporate exploitation and politicians’ privileges. These
protests forced political parties to open the path to constitutional
change, which involves replacing Pinochet’s authoritarian constitution
under the rule of a government committed to this system and the free
market. Why did this sudden social explosion emerge? What explains this
severe crisis of political representation? My argument points to Chile’s
rigid constitutional system composed of multiple authoritarian enclaves
and countermajoritarian institutions. This constitutional system was
successful in neutralizing any attempt at effecting significant change
on the part of social and political majorities. To be sure, this
institutional architecture provided political stability, diminishing
political polarization. Nevertheless, the rigidity of the system
protected the interests of the minority that supported Pinochet’s
regime, rendering the political system unresponsive to citizens’
demands, especially in crucial areas such as social rights and political
participation.
Dr. Rodrigo Espinoza is Professor and Researcher at Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago de Chile.
About the Talk
Chile has been recognized as one of the most stable democracies and
economic systems in Latin America. However, since last October, the
system has been suffering its biggest collapse of the last three
decades: millions of citizens took to the streets of Santiago demanding
an end to corporate exploitation and politicians’ privileges. These
protests forced political parties to open the path to constitutional
change, which involves replacing Pinochet’s authoritarian constitution
under the rule of a government committed to this system and the free
market. Why did this sudden social explosion emerge? What explains this
severe crisis of political representation? My argument points to Chile’s
rigid constitutional system composed of multiple authoritarian enclaves
and countermajoritarian institutions. This constitutional system was
successful in neutralizing any attempt at effecting significant change
on the part of social and political majorities. To be sure, this
institutional architecture provided political stability, diminishing
political polarization. Nevertheless, the rigidity of the system
protected the interests of the minority that supported Pinochet’s
regime, rendering the political system unresponsive to citizens’
demands, especially in crucial areas such as social rights and political
participation.
History Feb 18 2020 | 3:30 PM - 5:00 PM sst 220b